The Risk Intelligence Map, built privately with your data. Your sites, vendor hosting regions, and recovery targets on one live map, scored on the 5×5 scale your register already uses, with every figure one click from the agency that published it.
A BIA names a primary site and an alternate in two text fields. A vendor register lists four diversified SaaS providers without noticing they all run in the same cloud region. A recovery plan points at a data center four miles from the building it is supposed to replace, on the same grid, in the same flood plain. Each document is fine on its own. The loss happens where they overlap, and none of them can see it, because geography is a text field in three systems that never compare.
This engagement puts your estate on a map that already knows the hazards. Every location gets a screening score on the 5×5 scale your register already uses, and the impact side of that score comes from live, named intelligence: geopolitical advisories, natural hazard feeds, cloud region health. When a vendor fails or a storm turns, the question "what else of ours is inside that zone" has an answer you can show, not a project you have to start.
Geospatial intelligence is an active investment area for this practice. The public prototype grows with customer feedback and best-practice research, and private-build clients shape where it goes next.
Your sites, vendor hosting regions, and recovery targets, geocoded and layered onto the map. This is the dependency inventory most programs have never drawn in one place.
Every location scored on your existing register scale, with the impact side driven by live intelligence and the arithmetic visible. A screening number that tells you where to look next, and can show where it came from.
The distance between every primary and its recovery target, and whether the pair shares an exposure zone. Four miles apart on the same flood plain is not a recovery strategy.
Vendors grouped by where they actually run. Four names in one cloud region is one region risk, and this is where it becomes visible, including the fourth parties your register never reached.
How many people live and work inside every exposure zone you score. The travel and people question answered with the same picture as the site question, not a separate tool.
The private console becomes your incident and crisis teams' watch screen, with alerting when a live signal moves inside range of something you own. Every alert names its source.
With your estate on it, the map is not a report about your dependencies, it is the living record of them: what depends on what, where it runs, and where it recovers. Operational teams watch it daily, risk teams score with it, and risk leaders defend decisions from it.
Your estate, live feeds, scores, and alerting, delivered on a platform that meets your security and privacy requirements, and kept current as your footprint changes.
Every location's screening score on your 5×5 scale, in a format that loads straight into the register and BIA you already run.
Concentrations, separation gaps, and duty-of-care exposures, written for the audience that has to act on them, with every figure traceable to its source.
Walkthroughs with your incident, risk, and resilience teams so the console is operated, not just admired.
Your footprint, your concerns, and what your teams need from a shared picture. No preparation required.
The estate data you have, the platform and security requirements the build must meet, and the scope and price agreed before work starts.
Estate onboarded, scores calculated, separation and concentration findings drafted, alerting configured for your teams.
Working sessions with the teams who will run it, the findings brief presented to the leaders who will act on it.
Same console, different data. The public prototype runs entirely on public feeds in your browser and stores nothing. The private build adds your estate, and that changes the hosting question, which is why it is delivered on a platform that meets your security and privacy requirements.
No, and it does not pretend to. The 5×5 output is a screening score: it ranks your estate, shows its arithmetic, and tells you where a deeper assessment is worth the cost. Stating that limit plainly is what makes the rest of the number credible.
Every signal is named, dated, and one click from the agency that published it. If a figure cannot be traced, it does not go on the map. That rule is the product.
Scope and price are set in the first conversation, sized to your footprint.